By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
News as they happen
  • News
  • Canada
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Science
  • World News
  • Isness
Reading: Travel Company to Pay $35 Million, Settle FTC Allegations of Customer Deception
Sign In
Font ResizerAa
News as they happenNews as they happen
  • News
  • Canada
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Science
  • World News
  • Isness
  • News
  • Canada
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Science
  • World News
  • Isness
Have an existing account? Sign In
© Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
travel-company-to-pay-$35-million,-settle-ftc-allegations-of-customer-deception
Travel Company to Pay $35 Million, Settle FTC Allegations of Customer Deception

Travel Company to Pay $35 Million, Settle FTC Allegations of Customer Deception

Last updated: July 6, 2026 1:48 am
By Naveen Athrappully
6 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Travel app Hopper will pay $35 million to settle a lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that accused the company of unfairly charging hidden fees and misrepresenting the total price of its offerings, the agency said in a July 2 statement.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on July 2, was filed against Hopper Inc. and Hopper (USA) Inc., both of which together operate the various Hopper apps, which enable people to book flights, rent cars, and reserve short-term rentals such as vacation homes and hotel rooms. Defendants have routinely advertised Hopper’s travel booking services using taglines such as “No Hidden Fees” and “Transparent Pricing Always,” and claiming that “prices include all fees,” the lawsuit said.

“Contrary to Defendants’ representations that Hopper’s prices have no hidden fees or ‘gotcha’ charges and include all fees, Defendants have routinely charged consumers hidden or ‘gotcha’ fees,” the complaint said.

“Further, these fees have not been included in advertised prices. Thus, contrary to Defendants’ representations, the advertised prices do not ‘include all fees.’”

The lawsuit accused the defendants of charging two specific types of fees without consumer consent—a Tip fee and a VIP Support customer service fee. These were allegedly never shown in Hopper’s advertised prices for air travel, car rentals, and short-term lodging bookings.

For instance, between 2020 and late 2023, when a customer booked a service, such as a flight, the app’s payment screen initially showed the price the customer had to pay. Upon clicking the “Continue” button, the customer was taken to a review screen and encouraged to swipe to book the flight. However, at the bottom of the screen, both Tip fees and VIP Support charges would allegedly be preselected.

Only when a customer scrolled down the review screen would they see the two additional charges. If they chose to swipe instead, the final price they paid would include all charges, according to the complaint.

In several instances, defendants allegedly charged the two fees even when the travel booking was not confirmed, according to the lawsuit. The defendants also allegedly failed to refund fees on several occasions when customers canceled the booking within the permitted period.

Additionally, defendants are accused of misrepresenting their “Price Freeze” service since at least 2019, claiming that it allowed customers to retain an advertised price for a certain period of time and book the travel later at the same price, according to the complaint.

However, contrary to the claims, Price Freeze protected a consumer against a price increase only up to a certain limit, according to the lawsuit.

In its statement, the FTC said the defendants generated millions of dollars in additional revenue from the optional Tip and VIP service fees. The accused received several complaints from consumers that they never consented to the extra charges. Besides customers, the company’s employees had also raised concerns about the pricing tactics, according to the FTC.

FTC alleged that Hopper violated the Federal Trade Commission Act and the agency’s Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees.

Under the agreement, Hopper is banned from misrepresenting any fees and is obligated to “clearly and conspicuously” disclose all applicable fees and charges as well as the total price of their offering.

“The Commission will continue to use all available tools to promote price transparency and to combat unfair and deceptive pricing, billing, and cancellation practices,” said Christopher Mufarrige, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.

‘No Issues’ With Current App

In a July 2 statement, Hopper said it had decided to settle the lawsuit because the claims in the complaint are outdated and no longer have a bearing on its current business.

The settlement amount that the company is paying does not reflect the “merit of the claims” in the lawsuit but is a reflection of Hopper’s decision to move forward from the matter.

“Upon receiving millions of files dating from the present back to 2021, the FTC’s allegations were narrow: primarily outdated display practices implemented during the pandemic, limited to the Hopper app, and discontinued by Hopper in mid-2023, prior to the start of the FTC’s inquiry,” the company said.

“Importantly, the FTC raised no issues with the current Hopper app or website, other business divisions, current product offerings, or any other practices.”

The Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees, which the FTC said Hopper violated, came into effect in May 2025.

The regulation bans bait-and-switch and other pricing tactics used by businesses to hide the true final cost of an offering. It is applicable to businesses engaged in providing live-event tickets or short-term lodging.

The rule “preserves flexibility for businesses by not prohibiting any type or amount of fee or specific pricing strategies,” the agency said. Instead, it only requires businesses to tell customers the “whole truth up-front” regarding the total price of an offering and other fees.

Media
Trump Threatens to Fire Fed Chair If He Doesn’t Step Down Next Month
Trump Tightens Eligibility for SBA Loans, Barring Ownership by Green Card Holders
Activation Of The Military Commission Law
Rubio, Mexican Officials Agree to Joint Security, Immigration Agreement
TAGGED:BusinessCompaniesUSUS News
Share This Article
Facebook Email Copy Link Print
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

    5 + 6 =

    You Might Also Like

    merz-in-china:-germany-between-de-risking-and-strategic-partnership
    Uncategorized

    Merz in China: Germany Between De-Risking and Strategic Partnership

    By Valbona Zeneli
    10 Min Read
    central-banks-want-more-gold,-and-many-plan-to-keep-it-on-home-soil
    BusinessUncategorized

    Central Banks Want More Gold, and Many Plan to Keep It on Home Soil

    By Andrew Moran
    1 Min Read
    asylum-health-care-program-expected-to-cost-more-than-$1.5b-per-year:-budget-watchdog
    CanadaCanadian PoliticsFeatured Canadian NewsTop Canadian NewsUncategorizedWorld News

    Asylum Health-Care Program Expected to Cost More Than $1.5B per Year: Budget Watchdog

    By Olivia Gomm
    1 Min Read
    News as they happen

    We influence thousands of users and are the number one business and technology news network on the planet. Newsguard delivers everything you need to know to live your best life, best tech trend, traveling passion and more…

    Categories

    • The Escapist
    • Entertainment
    • Bussiness

    Quick Links

    • Advertise with us
    • Newsletters
    • Complaint
    • Deal

    @Newsguard – Codeus Design. All Rights Reserved.

    Welcome Back!

    Sign in to your account

    Username or Email Address
    Password

    Lost your password?